Mayor's Service Corp

Mayor's Service Corp

Mayor's Service Corp

A one-stop platform design for the Dearborn Government to recruit and match volunteers with citizens in need efficiently.


Design and implement an automated matching system based on Monday.com to connect volunteers and seniors of Dearborn, reducing staffs' manual workload and saving over $500,000 app development cost.

A one-stop platform design for the Dearborn Government to recruit and match volunteers with citizens in need efficiently.


Design and implement an automated matching system based on Monday.com to connect volunteers and seniors of Dearborn, reducing staffs' manual workload and saving over $500,000 app development cost.

iOS & Desktop

Timeline


Aug 2023 - Dec 2023 (4 months)

Timeline


Aug 2023 - Dec 2023 (4 months)

Timeline

2022.9 - 2022.12 (4 months)

My Roles


UX Research & Design, Experience & Service Design

My Roles


UX Research & Design, Experience & Service Design

Roles

User Research, Usability Testing, Interaction Design, UI Design

Tools


Figma, Monday.com, Google Sites

Tools


Figma, Monday.com, Google Sites

Tools

Adobe XD, Adobe Illustrator, Figjam

Team


Elaine Liu, Garret Potter, Jasper Ji, Ziyi Jiang

Team


Elaine Liu, Garret Potter, Jasper Ji, Ziyi Jiang

Team

Anirudh Kundu, Charlotte Du. Erin Zhan, Priyanshee Shah, Ziyi Jiang

OVERVIEW

OVERVIEW

OVERVIEW

Problem

Problem

Problem

The Mayor's Service Corps in Dearborn aims to improve its snow removal service for seniors and citizens with disabilities by fostering connection with volunteers from local high schools. Their previous working process involved tons of manual work in matching process with low efficiency and did not get enough volunteers.

Objective

Objective

Objective

How might we make it simple and efficient for people to sign up and match to volunteer opportunities with the Mayor’s Service Corp?

Challenge

Challenge

Challenge

Budget limitation

Budget limitation

The goverment has no budget to develop a new platform from 0 to 1.

The goverment has no budget to develop a new platform from 0 to 1.

Offline to online

Offline to online

The previous workflow only relied on manual work.

The previous workflow only relied on manual work.

Communication gap

There are serious communication gap between various stakeholders.

There are serious communication gap between various stakeholders.

Solution

Solution

Solution

Our team provided an all-in-one solution, a service system, to reduce manual work, improve the overall workflow efficiency, and enhance volunteer participation.




4 Plug-ins
5 Boards at back end for MSC staff
5 Forms for end users
1 Website for end users

Impact

Impact

Impact

Launched Jan 2024

The system was launched to public.

$ 500,000 Saved

By our development work

80% Manual Work Reduced

The manual work for volunteer matching was reduced with improved efficiency.

100+ Users

The system attracted over 100 active users in the system within 1 month.

HOW WE GET THERE

HOW WE GET THERE

HOW WE GET THERE

Background

Background

Background

Let's start with a story!

Let's start with a story!

Let's start with a story!

Contextual Inquirty

Contextual Inquirty

Contextual Inquirty

How do we know the previous flow & opportunites?

How do we know the previous flow & opportunites?

How do we know the previous flow & opportunites?

Our team conducted

5 rounds interviews in

1 month with

15 stakeholders and end users

👧🏼 👦🏽

2 Students

👱🏻‍♀️ 🧔🏽 🧔🏻‍♂️

3 MSC staff

👩🏻‍🦰

1 High school contact

👨🏽‍🦳 👵🏼

2 Residents

👩🏾 👩🏽‍🦱 👨🏼‍🦲

3 Developers

👨🏻

1 Coordinator

👨🏼‍🦱 🧑🏻‍🦰

2 Call center staff

We synthesized the data of result of interviews by business origami and current flow chart iteration.

Users' Journey Maps

Users' Journey Maps

Users' Journey Maps

Based on analysis above, the current process looks like…

Based on analysis above, the current process looks like…

Based on analysis above, the current process looks like…

Result Analysis

Result Analysis

Result Analysis

… so, what are their needs and opportunities?

… so, what are their needs and opportunities?

… so, what are their needs and opportunities?

Students

👧🏼 👦🏽

  • To select the locations to work by their own

  • To work as a group rather than individually out of safety concerns from parents

  • To select the locations to work by their own

  • To work as a group rather than individually out of safety concerns from parents

Residents

👨🏽‍🦳 👵🏼

  • To receive notice if there are volunteering coming to help

  • To receive notice if the snow shoveling is down

  • To receive notice if there are volunteering coming to help

  • To receive notice if the snow shoveling is down

MSC Staffs

👱🏻‍♀️ 🧔🏽 🧔🏻‍♂️

  • To screen and qualify the citizens

  • To screen and authorize non-students volunteers

  • To take the matching work with an automatical tool

  • To screen and qualify the citizens

  • To screen and authorize non-students volunteers

  • To take the matching work with an automatical tool

Call Center Staffs

👨🏼‍🦱 🧑🏻‍🦰

  • After filling forms, they can automatically popped up to MSC staff, instead of manually send the sheet to them from a separate platform

  • After filling forms, they can automatically popped up to MSC staff, instead of manually send the sheet to them from a separate platform

Competitive Analysis

Competitive Analysis

Competitive Analysis

How does Ann Arbor, a nearby city, solve this problem?

How does Ann Arbor, a nearby city, solve this problem?

How does Ann Arbor, a nearby city, solve this problem?

Pros


- Not involving 🧍‍♀️🧍🧍‍♂️too many staff in the process.
- Forms & sheets transformation to ArcGIS is 📥half auto.
- Aligning with existing stakeholders and 🙆🏻‍♀️needs.

Pros


- Not involving 🧍‍♀️🧍🧍‍♂️too many staff in the process.
- Forms & sheets transformation to ArcGIS is 📥half auto.
- Aligning with existing stakeholders and 🙆🏻‍♀️needs.

Cons


- Still 🧑‍💻lots of manual work for matching & email sending.
- ArcGIS 🙅‍♀️doesn’t play much role but incurs 👩‍🔧significant development and maintenance💰costs.

Decision Making Process

Decision Making Process

Decision Making Process

Why and how we chose an existing platform?

Why and how we chose an existing platform?

Why and how we chose an existing platform?

Based on all analysis above, we decide to choose a project management platform for integration because we need..

An☝️one-stop platform to integrate forms, sheets, matching process
A tool with💰low cost
A tool that can be implemented 💨 quickly, which means an existing platform allowing customization
A tool with customizable ⚙️automations

An☝️one-stop platform to integrate forms, sheets, matching process
A tool with💰low cost
A tool that can be implemented 💨 quickly, which means an existing platform allowing customization
A tool with customizable ⚙️automations

Then we compared the mainstreaming platforms in the current market

We finally chose Monday.com because it provides the best information transformationℹ️, integration with email/messages📧, and it allows high level automation customization⚙️ compared to other platforms.


Also, we found that some of the stakeholders have already used this platform in their daily work🧑‍💻, which means the relatively low learning lost and no extra subscription fee💰.

We finally chose Monday.com because it provides the best information transformationℹ️, integration with email/messages📧, and it allows high level automation customization⚙️ compared to other platforms.


Also, we found that some of the stakeholders have already used this platform in their daily work🧑‍💻, which means the relatively low learning lost and no extra subscription fee💰.

We finally chose Monday.com because it provides the best information transformationℹ️, integration with email/messages📧, and it allows high level automation customization⚙️ compared to other platforms.


Also, we found that some of the stakeholders have already used this platform in their daily work🧑‍💻, which means the relatively low learning lost and no extra subscription fee💰.

Co-Design

Co-Design

Co-Design

We facilitated a co-design session aiming to ideate an ideal flow

We facilitated a co-design session aiming to ideate an ideal flow

We facilitated a co-design session aiming to ideate an ideal flow

🧒🏻 👦🏻 👩🏻 👨🏼
👱🏻‍♀️🧔🏽🧔🏻‍♂️
👨🏻
👨🏼‍🦱🧑🏻‍🦰
👩🏾 👩🏽‍🦱 👨🏼‍🦲
👧🏼 👦🏽
👨🏽‍🦳 👵🏼

🧒🏻 👦🏻 👩🏻 👨🏼
👱🏻‍♀️🧔🏽🧔🏻‍♂️
👨🏻
👨🏼‍🦱🧑🏻‍🦰
👩🏾 👩🏽‍🦱 👨🏼‍🦲
👧🏼 👦🏽
👨🏽‍🦳 👵🏼

🧒🏻 👦🏻 👩🏻 👨🏼
👱🏻‍♀️🧔🏽🧔🏻‍♂️
👨🏻
👨🏼‍🦱🧑🏻‍🦰
👩🏾 👩🏽‍🦱 👨🏼‍🦲
👧🏼 👦🏽
👨🏽‍🦳 👵🏼

4 Designers (We are here!)

3 MSC staff

1 Coordinator

2 Call center staff

3 Developers

2 Students

2 Residents

Result of co-design

MVPs

MVPs

MVPs

Based on the new flow, 2 minimum viable products were developed

Based on the new flow, 2 minimum viable products were developed

Based on the new flow, 2 minimum viable products were developed

Iteration

Usability & comparative tests with all stakeholders

Usability & comparative tests with all stakeholders

Usability & comparative tests with all stakeholders

Testing Tasks

Results of usability testing


Enhanced Clarity and User Guidance: Provide clear instructions, contextual information, and immediate feedback upon form submission to guide users through the process and inform them of next steps. This includes explaining why certain information is requested and offering guidance on multi-selection questions.

Inclusivity and Accessibility: Incorporate features that cater to a diverse audience, including options for pronouns, gender identity, and accessibility accommodations such as ramps. Ensure forms are available in multiple languages to serve non-English speakers.


Feedback and Follow-Up Mechanisms: Establish clear mechanisms for volunteer and citizen feedback, including flexible photo submission policies and a grace period for submissions. Inform participants about how and where they can provide additional feedback or receive follow-up support.

Results of usability testing


Enhanced Clarity and User Guidance: Provide clear instructions, contextual information, and immediate feedback upon form submission to guide users through the process and inform them of next steps. This includes explaining why certain information is requested and offering guidance on multi-selection questions.

Inclusivity and Accessibility: Incorporate features that cater to a diverse audience, including options for pronouns, gender identity, and accessibility accommodations such as ramps. Ensure forms are available in multiple languages to serve non-English speakers.


Feedback and Follow-Up Mechanisms: Establish clear mechanisms for volunteer and citizen feedback, including flexible photo submission policies and a grace period for submissions. Inform participants about how and where they can provide additional feedback or receive follow-up support.

Results of usability testing


Enhanced Clarity and User Guidance: Provide clear instructions, contextual information, and immediate feedback upon form submission to guide users through the process and inform them of next steps. This includes explaining why certain information is requested and offering guidance on multi-selection questions.

Inclusivity and Accessibility: Incorporate features that cater to a diverse audience, including options for pronouns, gender identity, and accessibility accommodations such as ramps. Ensure forms are available in multiple languages to serve non-English speakers.


Feedback and Follow-Up Mechanisms: Establish clear mechanisms for volunteer and citizen feedback, including flexible photo submission policies and a grace period for submissions. Inform participants about how and where they can provide additional feedback or receive follow-up support.

Results of comparative testing


Usability and Clarity: There were concerns about the clarity of instructions, particularly regarding the selection of schools, the purpose of certain fields, and the process of choosing volunteer locations.


Safety and Privacy: Volunteers expressed a desire to know more about the residents they would be helping, including names, to ensure personal safety and comfort.


Preference: Volunteers preferred the simpler one, Process 2, for the additional context it provides about volunteering opportunities and the chance to coordinate with other volunteers.

Results of comparative testing


Usability and Clarity: There were concerns about the clarity of instructions, particularly regarding the selection of schools, the purpose of certain fields, and the process of choosing volunteer locations.


Safety and Privacy: Volunteers expressed a desire to know more about the residents they would be helping, including names, to ensure personal safety and comfort.


Preference: Volunteers preferred the simpler one, Process 2, for the additional context it provides about volunteering opportunities and the chance to coordinate with other volunteers.

Deliverables

Deliverables

Deliverables

Final flow

Final flow

Final flow

How we address needs in forms and boards design?

How we address needs in forms and boards design?

How we address needs in forms and boards design?

To screen/qualify the citizens


Only disabled/elderly citizens without funding can be approved automatically, while the information of the rest applicants will be sent to the section 'Review these request' of the citizen request information board to be reviewed and approved by staff manually.

To screen/qualify the citizens


Only disabled/elderly citizens without funding can be approved automatically, while the information of the rest applicants will be sent to the section 'Review these request' of the citizen request information board to be reviewed and approved by staff manually.

To screen/qualify the citizens


Only disabled/elderly citizens without funding can be approved automatically, while the information of the rest applicants will be sent to the section 'Review these request' of the citizen request information board to be reviewed and approved by staff manually.

Students’ flexibility


Students are allowed to fill a separate matching form to choose the locations they want to work on their own.

Students’ flexibility


Students are allowed to fill a separate matching form to choose the locations they want to work on their own.

Students’ flexibility


Students are allowed to fill a separate matching form to choose the locations they want to work on their own.

Students' safety concern


  1. Students under 18 need to provide guardians' information.

  2. Students over 18 need to sign to agree to guidelines and policies.

  3. Students need to provide the information about what school and school clubs they are in to prove their identities as students.

  4. Once non-students volunteers apply, their information will be reviewed and approved by MSC staff.

Students' safety concern


  1. Students under 18 need to provide guardians' information.

  2. Students over 18 need to sign to agree to guidelines and policies.

  3. Students need to provide the information about what school and school clubs they are in to prove their identities as students.

  4. Once non-students volunteers apply, their information will be reviewed and approved by MSC staff.

Boards interfaces for MSC staff at the back end

Boards interfaces for MSC staff at the back end

Boards interfaces for MSC staff at the back end

Board of citizen request information

Board of citizen request information

Board of volunteer application information

Board of volunteer application information

Board of matching

Board of matching

Board of citizen feedback

Board of citizen feedback

Board of volunteer feedback

Board of volunteer feedback

REFLECTION

REFLECTION

REFLECTION

Learnings


Considering Multiple Perspectives in Design - Addressing Diversified User Needs

Our project highlighted the significance of incorporating multiple perspectives, necessitating a design approach that catered to diverse user needs. Working closely with stakeholders, we learned the value of empathy and collaboration in crafting a user-friendly design. The resulting product was a testament to the importance of inclusivity and accessibility when addressing a heterogeneous audience.


Understanding the Entire Product Development Cycle

The project provided a comprehensive understanding of the full product development cycle, from conceptualization to delivery. We learned the importance of each stage, embracing an iterative process that included feedback loops for continual improvement. This gave us insights into effective project management and the need to adapt to changing requirements throughout the life of the project.


Collaboration and Seeking Help from Others

Our success hinged on the ability to collaborate effectively and seek expertise when necessary. Engaging with professionals and support services like 'superform' allowed us to navigate technical challenges and fostered an environment rich in knowledge sharing. The project underscored the power of collective effort and the benefits of pooling diverse skill sets to achieve common goals.


Acknowledging Limitations and Trade-offs in the Real World

The project taught us the practical lesson that real-world scenarios invariably come with limitations and trade-offs. We faced constraints related to budget, time, and resources, which forced us to make strategic decisions about feature prioritization. This process sharpened our problem-solving skills and taught us the necessity of flexibility and pragmatism in project execution.


Considering Multiple Perspectives in Design - Addressing Diversified User Needs

Our project highlighted the significance of incorporating multiple perspectives, necessitating a design approach that catered to diverse user needs. Working closely with stakeholders, we learned the value of empathy and collaboration in crafting a user-friendly design. The resulting product was a testament to the importance of inclusivity and accessibility when addressing a heterogeneous audience.


Understanding the Entire Product Development Cycle

The project provided a comprehensive understanding of the full product development cycle, from conceptualization to delivery. We learned the importance of each stage, embracing an iterative process that included feedback loops for continual improvement. This gave us insights into effective project management and the need to adapt to changing requirements throughout the life of the project.


Collaboration and Seeking Help from Others

Our success hinged on the ability to collaborate effectively and seek expertise when necessary. Engaging with professionals and support services like 'superform' allowed us to navigate technical challenges and fostered an environment rich in knowledge sharing. The project underscored the power of collective effort and the benefits of pooling diverse skill sets to achieve common goals.


Acknowledging Limitations and Trade-offs in the Real World

The project taught us the practical lesson that real-world scenarios invariably come with limitations and trade-offs. We faced constraints related to budget, time, and resources, which forced us to make strategic decisions about feature prioritization. This process sharpened our problem-solving skills and taught us the necessity of flexibility and pragmatism in project execution.

For work inquires feel free to get in touch with me!

Made with cups of coffee ☕️☕️☕️ and a loud laptop fan

@ Ziyi Jiang 2024

For work inquires feel free to get in touch with me!

Made with cups of coffee ☕️☕️☕️ and a loud laptop fan

@ Ziyi Jiang 2024

For work inquires feel free to get in touch with me!

Made with cups of coffee ☕️☕️☕️ and a loud laptop fan

@ Ziyi Jiang 2024